TREVOR KENT 
(past president National Association of Estate Agents and media property commentator)
AGAINST HOME INFORMATION PACKS
(FORMERLY SELLERS PACKS)

To Contact Trevor at his Gerrards Cross Office call 01753 885522 or email  trevor@trevorkentmedia.com 
He is ISDN radio equipped

click here for the Government's HIP website


ROUND-UP OF PRESS RELEASES & ARTICLES UP TO 2007   

FOLLOW THIS LINK TO LATEST COMMENT

Trevor Kent 9th November 2006  

 

HIPs must be terminated, but don't just take my word for it (despite the fact my word's been consistent since 1997 on this subject) no, read the recent comments by two very august bodies -  The Council of Mortgage Lenders  and the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors .  Then write to your Labour MP and say 'forget my vote, I'm not paying £500 for an Energy Inspector to nose round  my home before you give me  permission to put my house on the market'. Or write to your Conservative MP and say 'thanks for pledging to repeal HIPs because you know they're rubbish, my vote's yours come the election'.

 

Trevor Kent 6th November 2006  
 
CONSERVATIVES SCRATCH THE SURFACE OF HIP'S OPEN WOUND
 

The government are indeed launching their 'dry-run' of Home Information Packs this week through a joint initiative from the Department for Communities and Local Government (the old ODPM)  and their Association of Home Information Pack Providers (AHIPP).  "Despite the fact that the intended roll-out of mandatory HIPs will cover the whole of England and Wales from June 2007," says Trevor Kent former president of The National Association of Estate Agents,  " only six relatively prosperous towns in England have been selected, and even in these only a few convenient postcodes have been identified for trial".

 

Only last week Trevor Kent attended the 'launch' meeting intended to attract support for the dry run at one venue - Northampton. "nearly two hundred attendees accepted the government's wine and finger buffet as far as I could see," he said, " but all but a handful appeared to be  HIP providers, Home Inspectors (the new surveyors who will visit every home to draw up  the  HIP) and conveyancers - all potential big earners from HIPs". Only a dozen or so estate agents, whom the DCLG were are relying on to serve up  the guinea pig sellers on a plate, identified themselves at the meeting. "Agents will not co-operate with the government in a trial of what they believe to be nonsense legislation" Trevor Kent observes, "especially when they've already seen one climb-down with the withdrawal of Home Condition Reports from the Packs, there is  just no trust  whatever left in the DCLG to do a business-like job".

 

Commentators  seeking to monitor the progress of the dry runs can contact Chris O'Dea 020 7944 4400 ext 19511 at the DCLG for Cambridge and Huddersfield, Maxine Walker extension 19342 for Newcastle and Northampton, and Tracey Hayworth on 020 7944 3646 for Bath and Southampton. Pertinent questions might be on the lines of "even when they're free how many prospective sellers have  accepted a  HIP on their home?", another enquiry  continues Trevor Kent might be "are the prospective buyers even bothering to read the reports before offering on the houses they fancy?". The final stab that might just herald the end of Home Information Packs could just be to ask en passant, "do you think, in the light of your trial run experiences, that 3m people a year will spend £500 a time on a HIP and wait three weeks off the market whilst it's  being prepared ?". Armed with the answers from the poor old foot soldiers charged with implementation in the field, a final foray with their Commander in Chief Yvette Cooper might just elicit the response so many millions are pleading for, the white flag of surrender before more blood is lost.

 

end

 

Trevor Kent PPNAEA 

Property Market Commentator & Anti-HIP Campaigner

o 01753 885522

e pressrelease@trevorkentmedia.com

ISDN by arrangement

 
 
 

Press Release                        Conservatives

t (Press) 020 7984 8121
t
(Broadcast) 020 7984 8100
f
020 7984 8272

6th November 2006

Ref:2037/06

 

Sellers Packs so unpopular, Labour is giving them away (and you pay)

£4 million of taxpayers’ money being spent to ‘save Ministers’ faces’

The Government is today launching a “dry run” of the controversial Home Information Packs in six locations across England . The Packs, in a slimmed down form, will be compulsory from June 2007. Sellers face repeated £200 fines for trying to market or sell their home without a Pack. 

Yet today Conservatives are today exposing:

·                 The Government is spending £4 million of taxpayers’ money to provide “incentives” for the consumers to use Packs.

·                 In all of the six trials, home owners are being offered a free pack, paid for by the taxpayer.

·                 By contrast, from June, home owners will face a £500+ fee to buy a Pack. The Government has refused to say how much the new ‘half-HIPs’ will cost including VAT.

·                 The trial is entirely voluntary. But from June, home owners will be fined £200 by town hall officers for trying to sell their home without a pack. The fine will be repeated for continuing non-compliance.

 

Caroline Spelman, Shadow Local Government Secretary, said:

“This so-called dry run is a sham. The controversial Home Information Packs are so unpopular that the Government is having to give them away – with the taxpayer left footing the bill. In no way will a free trial provide a proper model for the potentially damaging effects to the housing market of these flawed Packs. The Labour Government is simply wasting £4 million of taxpayer’s money to save Ministers’ faces.”

 Notes to editors

£4 MILLION ON GIVING AWAY HOME INFORMATION PACKS

 “Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government in what ways sellers will be encouraged to take up voluntary home information packs during the dry run.

 Yvette Cooper: Home information packs (HIPs) will be promoted by participating estate agents and local information campaigns. To get the trials going and to test the HIPs, there will be a limited number of free packs and reduced cost packs, for sellers who want to try them out, as well as full cost packs.”

 Hansard, 31 October 2006, col. 278W.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm061031/text/61031w0005.htm#06103178001356

 “Yvette Cooper: We will promote the voluntary take-up of HCRs, and have allocated £4 million to support their take-up and testing of home information packs.”

 Hansard, 16 October 2006, col. 1027W.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm061016/text/61016w0022.htm#06101719000723

 

COST OF THE PACKS FROM JUNE 

The Government has refused to say how much the new 'half' HIPs will cost. Previously, they estimated £600 - £700 + VAT for a HIP including the Home Condition Report (HCR). The HCR was to cost £300. Without the HCR, an Energy Performance Certificate will still have to be paid for. This suggests a price of £500-£600 including VAT.

 Government refuses to say how much they will cost…

 “Michael Gove: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether VAT will be levied on  (a) all and  (b) some of the items within home information packs.

 Dawn Primarolo: The extent to which VAT will be payable on the costs incurred by a prospective house seller in compiling a home information pack will depend on what is included in the pack, and on how the person chooses to compile it. It has not yet been finally determined by the Department for Communities and Local Government what the full contents of a pack will comprise, pending evaluation of the ‘dry run’. 

Hansard, 10 October 2006, col. 726W

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm061010/text/61010w0016.htm#column_726W 

“Michael Gove: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the cost of an energy performance certificate is expected to be including VAT; and whether the cost is expected to vary according to the size of the property.

 Yvette Cooper: The price of an energy performance certificate will be set by the market and not by Government. We expect these costs to vary according to the size, type and location of the property. Trials are planned to take place during November 2006 to assess the indicative time and costs of producing energy performance certificates.”

 Hansard, 16 October 2006, col. 1026W.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm061016/text/61016w0022.htm#06101719000723 

£200 FINES FROM JUNE

 “Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Meriden (Mrs. Spelman) of 2 October 2006,  Official Report, column 2535W, on home information packs, what period of time must elapse before a vendor could be fined £200 again for an on-going breach. 

Yvette Cooper: Where enforcement officers decide to take action following a breach of the home information pack duties, they will have the option of serving a penalty charge notice. The penalty charge is set at £200 in the Home Information Pack Regulations 2006. It will be for Trading Standards Officers to make the appropriate judgment regarding enforcement of the regulations.”

 Hansard, 24 October 2006, col. 1793W.

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm061024/text/61024w0013.htm#06102472000529 

TRIAL AREAS - WITH THE FREE PACKS

 “From 6 November 2006, the Government, in partnership with industry, is rolling out area trials in six areas, Bath , Cambridge , Huddersfield, Newcastle , Northampton and Southampton , aimed to help test both the Packs and full Home Condition Reports.”

http://www.homeinformationpacks.gov.uk/home.aspx 

“Sellers with properties in the BA1-BA3, BS31, BS39 and BS40 postcode areas will be eligible to benefit from a Government funded incentive. The current incentive is a FREE Home Information Pack.”

http://www.homeinformationpacks.gov.uk/trials_bath.aspx 

“Sellers with properties in the CB1-CB5 postcode areas will be eligible to benefit from a Government funded incentive. The current incentive is a FREE Home Information Pack.”

http://www.homeinformationpacks.gov.uk/trials_cambridge.aspx 

“Sellers with properties in the HD1-HD9 postcode areas will be eligible to benefit from a Government funded incentive. The current incentive is a FREE Home Information Pack.”

http://www.homeinformationpacks.gov.uk/trials_huddersfield.aspx

 “Sellers with properties in the CB1-CB5 postcode areas will be eligible to benefit from a Government funded incentive. The current incentive is a FREE Home Information Pack.”

http://www.homeinformationpacks.gov.uk/trials_newcastle.aspx 

“Sellers with properties in the NN1-NN5, NN8 and NN9 postcode areas will be eligible to benefit from a Government funded incentive. The current incentive is a FREE Home Information Pack.”

http://www.homeinformationpacks.gov.uk/trials_northampton.aspx 

“Sellers with properties in the SO14-SO19 postcode areas will be eligible to benefit from a Government funded incentive. The current incentive is a FREE Home Information Pack.”

http://www.homeinformationpacks.gov.uk/trials_southampton.aspx

 ENDS 

 


 

Trevor Kent 26th October 2006  

  WE TOLD YOU SO MINISTER, AND THE FIVE BEFORE YOU

The welcome recent call from the  Council of Mortgage Lenders (a body that both Mr Blair and Mr Brown DO sometimes take notice of) to abandon Home Information Packs is timely indeed, but will it be heeded?

It had been immediately preceded by a Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors claim that  the introduction of Packs by the government must be halted, a view  supported by the Conservative Party. The National Association of Estate Agents and individual commentators such as I have, of course, been brave enough to say this for years.

The Department of Communities and Local Government had recently disbanded their own Stakeholder Group of industry 'advisors' , no doubt because the DCLG could no longer stomach further 'drop HIP advice'  from professionals who understand the property market, advice hitherto so distainfully ignored

The department's own official so called 'Dry Runs'  planned to test HIP implementation in six English towns  in the first week of November, appear doomed before they begin with estate agents refusing their support. 

The final nail in the hoped for coffin for HIPs was an admission on 23 October by  the DCLG that their own MORI/BRE Baseline Study of 3000 estate agents' sales in May and June had been a fiasco with participants 'only in the hundreds'. Thus legislators will not  have their required reliable  picture of the market prior to HIPs to judge whether the packs  had improved the transaction experience  after introduction in June 2007. 

Someone in government ( perhaps Housing Minister number six) needs to take this dying initiative by the scruff of the neck and put  it down as quickly and  humanely as possible, before further millions are wasted. It will, of course, be too late for private individuals who have, in some cases, sunk their life savings into preparing to be  HIP surveyors. They have already suffered from the political incompetence and  business naivety of a totally discredited government , it will be the public's turn next, unless Home Information Packs are quickly consigned the the Graveyard of failed Labour initiatives - that's if there's still room for the interment. 

End

Trevor Kent PPNAEA   
Property Market Commentator & Anti-HIP Campaigner

o 01753 885522  
e
pressrelease@trevorkentmedia.com

ISDN by arrangement

Trevor Kent  11th October 2006  

A few hours in advance of the House of Lords debate on Home Information Packs (Wednesday 11th October 2006) I was able to advise the Conservative team critical of the policy, lead by Michael Gove MP in the Commons and Baroness Hanham in the Lords, that I believe a recent 'Baseline Study' of the property market ordered by the Deputy PM has been a failure.

On 21st April 2006 Kevin Roper of the ODPM wrote to 3000 estate agents inviting them to assist in research to 'evaluate the current buying and selling process of homes in England and Wales'. He claimed that the 'aim is to provide a benchmark against which to measure the impact of the national roll-out of Home Information Packs'.

Agents were asked to fill in a brief transaction form for each property that completed, or was withdrawn from sale, between 15th May and 9th June 2006.  They were also asked to 'fill in a feedback form at the end of the study'.  Alex Chester at the Building Research Establishment was offered as the query point and MORI was said, by Mr Roper, also to be involved in the study.

As a long-term critic of the proposed introduction of Home Information Packs, I was naturally keen to learn of the progress of the creation of this  'Baseline'. Over the last month I have attempted to get progress reports from every party  involved - but to no avail. No one in government, the BRE or MORI would talk to me.

In desperation I had letters published in Estate Agency magazines asking agents to let me know how they got on with their participation LINK TO LETTER. The readership is collectively about 15000 agents.  To date I have had no letters from agents advising me that they had been involved.

I strongly believe that the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (now the Department for Communities and Local Government) must have quietly withdrawn the study to save embarrassment. Yet, at  the same time, they fanfare  their investment of £4m to enable a group of commercial companies (already standing by to make millions out of the introduction of Packs) perform a 'dry run' of HIPs for them. Theirs is sure to be an objective report!

Home Information Packs are a disaster in the making, criticized on every hand by property professionals in every discipline of the industry.  Yet, Labour ploughs on regardless and without the help of the House of Lords LINK TO DEBATE and other critics such as I, 3m people a year will be soon be paying an average of £500 to put their homes on the market from June 1 next year.  This legislation must be repealed forthwith.

Trevor Kent PPNAEA   
Property Market Commentator & Anti-HIP Campaigner

o 01753 885522  
e
pressrelease@trevorkentmedia.com

ISDN by arrangement

Trevor Kent   21st September 2006

 

THE HIP's BROKEN - DON'T MEND IT

The Home Information Pack was invented in 1997 by Labour to apparently cure ills in the house sales market.  They suggested that 3m homeowners a year would be happy to pay for a survey to be done on their home, searches collected, energy efficiency checked, title deeds inspected and all this information given to anyone who wanted it (at a cost to the seller of  £1000). The Government also believed that these sellers would be happy to be fined £200 a day if they tried to nail a For Sale board up before they had bought their 'Pack'. Fat chance.

Public and commentators assumed, following the Housing Minister's announcement on July 18th, that HIPs were no more.  This is still far from the case.  The DCLG have dropped the need for the 'survey' to be included in the Pack but still insist the rest of the rubbish will have to be produced by sellers on and after 1 June 2007.

Before implementation, the Government is committed to evaluating a so-called 'dry run' to assess whether the Packs will work for the public. Today they have announced a £4m subsidy will be given to a group of companies already set up to make a business of producing HIP reports.  They seriously expect these companies, who stand to make millions when HIPs are finally introduced, to report in an unbiased fashion on how HIPs work.

"This plan brings to mind MORI being asked to enquire of 1000 turkeys whether they think a plan to abandon Christmas would be a good idea" says Trevor Kent.

There are no surveyors to prepare the Energy Performance Certificates, there are no buyers who will be interested in reading their reports, and their solicitors will not wish to rely on old searches provided in the Pack.  “Frankly the HIP is, and always has been a complete farce - a total waste of money and likely to cause house-price inflation” says Trevor Kent, former president of the National Association of Estate Agents.

"Every profession involved in house sales has called on the Government to abandon HIPs, yet they plough on regardless.  This is breathtaking arrogance, a true 'we known your business better that you do attitude' and, after today's announcement, a case of  'we'll put your money where our mouth is to prove it', as well." says Kent.

“This HIP business”, concludes Trevor Kent, “just has to be stopped and my guess is that the penny will only drop when the Government discovers that the public will not allow themselves to be part of this dry-run -  EVEN WHEN THEIR HIPS ARE PROVIDED FREE'.  

End

Trevor Kent PPNAEA   
Property Market Commentator & Anti-HIP Campaigner

o 01753 885522  
e
pressrelease@trevorkentmedia.com

ISDN by arrangement

Trevor Kent is former president of the National Association of Estate Agents and has been a fervent anti-HIP campaigner through the reigns of five Housing Ministers. He is still an independent single office estate agent and regularly broadcasts on property .    

OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING   11 September 2006  

 

Boost for consumer protection in door-to-door sales

The OFT today welcomed the Government's announcement that it will legislate to provide cooling-off periods on goods and services sold to people in their homes, even when the sales representatives have been invited to visit.

As the law stands consumers have the right to cancel within a seven day period when a sales visit is unsolicited, but an OFT study found that 94 per cent of consumers were unaware of these cancellation rights. Under the new proposals consumers will also have the same protection when buying goods from representatives irrespective of whether they have been formally invited into their home.

These changes will complement the forthcoming 'Unfair Commercial Practices' legislation which will take positive action on aggressive sales techniques used by representatives. This includes pressurizing consumers into buying a product or service, by outstaying their welcome in consumers' homes, or falsely claiming they will get a better deal if they sign up immediately to prevent them from buying elsewhere.  Jonathan May, Director at the OFT said:

'Extending protection in this way means that consumers shopping from home can be confident that they are protected from unscrupulous doorstep sellers.' More information and advice on doorstep selling can be found by downloading the

 OFT leaflet at www.oft.gov.uk

NOTES

1. A statistical summary of the responses to the Doorstep selling consultation has been published. For a statistical summary of responses to the doorstep selling consultation can be found on the DTI website - www.dti.gov.uk MEDIA enquiries: 020 7211+ Corinne Gladstone 8899 Terence Gibbons 8900 Lara Gorman 8133 Nick Spears 8901 Jonathan Marciano 8898 

Out of hours: mobile: 07774 134814 fax messages: 020 7211 8961

Copies of press notices: Ext. 8993

http://www.oft.gov.uk

PUBLIC enquiries: 0845 7224499 enquiries@oft.gov.uk

OFT reports and consumer information leaflets are available free from:

 --------------------------------------------------------------------

NDSREF: 137846

 Issued by : OFT Press Office

Contact : mark.kram@oft.gsi.gov.uk

HIPs SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO SINK WITHOUT TRACE

It's a misapprehension to believe HOME INFORMATION PACKS are no more since the government announced that the 'survey'  element would no longer be a constituent part. HIPS are, at the moment, still to be introduced for home sellers from June 1 2007 in their reduced form.

Another broadside has, however, been unleashed on HIPs today which will hole the already creaking hulk below the waterline, and it's come from friendly fire.

Estate agents and Home Information Pack Providers are still  bound by law to take an average of £500 off every intending house seller 14 days in advance of marketing in order to prepare the 'reduced HIP'. Many will sign up the sellers on their first visit to the home for sale when 'measuring up and advising on price'. If the sellers cannot pay cash for their HIP, a finance agreement will be offered.

The DTI has today announced that it is to legislate that all occupiers will soon be entitled to a  'cooling -off period' of 7 days during which time they will have the right to cancel any goods and services sold to them in their homes by invitation. The OFT confirmed today this will include those sales people selling mandatory  HIPs. Thus 'Home Inspectors' will now have to wait another seven days, for a possible cancellation, before beginning to prepare the Pack.

The result is that, thanks to one department of government not knowing what another is up to, even more potential chaos now reigns for home sellers and those who advise them. Trevor Kent, former president of the National Association of Estate Agents and a critic of HIPs since 1997 when they were first proposed, is exasperated by this latest news, "can anyone seriously suggest that Home Information Pack Legislation can be allowed to continue, when a home seller will now have to wait three weeks before being allowed to market their home, and become law-breakers with a £200 per day fine if they jump the gun and nail a For Sale sign up before their Pack is ready?".  Trevor added  "Maybe the DTI and the OFT already know 'reduced HIPs'  are still a nonsense and, perhaps,  they are trying to tell Mesdames Ruth Kelly and Yvette Cooper at the DCLG so. I only hope they're listening. They must grasp the nettle and consign  HIPs to the deep without further delay, before they themselves sink into oblivion as a direct result of this blind folly ".

End

Trevor Kent is a former President of the National Association of Estate Agents.  He has laboured tirelessly and without remuneration or vested interest (other than being an estate agent) to warn the public of the perils of Home Information Pack  implementation.

(o) 01753 885522
trevor@homeinformationpacks.com 

 

 

NOT GONE, NOT FORGOTTEN

WHAT NEXT?   If professionals and the public are rejoicing in the belief that HOME INFORMATION PACKS (HIPs) ARE NO MORE following the Minister's announcement printed beneath, then they are under a serious misapprehension.

 THE FACTS    What the government has said (unless there is a further U-turn) is that HIPs will still be mandatory on 1st June 2007, but that sellers will not, at the moment, be forced to pay for and include the 'survey' element known as The Home Condition Report.  Sellers will, however, still be required by law to buy Searches and pay for a surveyor to visit their homes to prepare a Energy Performance Certificate.

 THE COST?   What sellers will still have to pay for this newly proposed 'reduced HIP'  will depend upon the size, age and complexity of their homes, together with the cost of Searches for their area (which vary greatly by region). A HIP provider will also have to have sight of their Title Deeds and have an Energy Surveyor close at hand to keep travelling charges down.  It is quite possible a 'Reduced HIP' for an average 3 bedroom semi will cost £350 + VAT.   A South of England 4 bedroom commuter home could cost £700, a luxury home nearer £1000, and you've still paid even if you don't sell.

 THE LAW?   It is not yet clear whether the public and/or estate agents will still be liable to a £200 a day fine if they don't buy a 'Reduced HIP' when a property goes on the market (Yvette Cooper the Housing Minister had certainly planned this to be the case with the 'Original HIPs' ).

 USEFULNESS OF 'REDUCED HIPs'?   The Consumers Association, the only body to have supported HIPs from their dastardly conception on a table in 1998 by John Prescott, now say of mandatory 'Reduced HIPs', they are a "half-baked compromise ...... little value but of real expense to consumers and WHICH? cannot therefore continue to provide support."  Michael Gove, the Conservative Shadow Housing Minister, has called for "Government to abandon the whole scheme".  Buyers will not be interested in the 'thermal efficiency' of the house they want to buy, their solicitors won't be interested in Searches once aged a few weeks, and buyers will have to pay for new ones.  Mortgage Lenders will have no use at all for the 'Reduced HIP'.  A complete waste of time and money.

 THE HOME-OWNING PUBLIC AND ALL  ASSOCIATIONS, INSTITUTIONS AND CONGLOMERATES INVOLVED IN THE PROPERTY TRANSFER INDUSTRY SHOULD CONTINUE TO PRESS FOR 'REDUCED HIPs' TO BE  HUMANELY PUT DOWN AND BURIED ALONG WITH THE ORIGINAL PACKS.  RESURRECTION OF THIS IMBECILIC SCHEME SHOULD  NOT BE ATTEMPTED IN WHAT EVER MANIFESTATION, EVEN BY A GOVERNMENT WHO SEEMS TO THINK ITSELF OMNIPOTENT.

 There are 23 million home-owners in England Wales and Scotland (yes, Scotland is due their own style of HIP soon too), if you think what I think,  you should 'X'  them out come the election .

 Trevor Kent 
5th August 2006
 

 

 

 

18th July 2006

THE BEGINNING OF THE END ??

MINISTERIAL STATEMENT BELOW

DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

 Home Information Packs implementation.

The Minister for Housing and Planning (Yvette Cooper):   I am today setting out further details of the Government’s implementation strategy and dry run for Home Information Packs (HIPs).

 The aims of the HIPs programme

 The aims of the government’s reforms to the home buying and selling process are three fold:

 (i)         to provide home owners with important energy efficiency information about their homes to help them cut fuel bills and carbon emissions.  This is vital as homes account for 27% of Britain’s carbon emissions.  Energy Performance Certificates will provide clear information about the energy efficiency of homes and how that can be improved.  The Energy Saving Trust estimate that following the advice in Energy Performance Certificates could save the average home owner up to £300 a year on their fuel bills The government believes it is important to implement these as early as possible given the importance of reducing carbon emissions.

 (ii)        to benefit consumers by cutting waste and duplication, speeding up home sales and reducing the number of failed transactions, which at present cost consumers around £350m a year in wasted costs.

(iii)       to encourage and support long term transformation of the home buying and selling industry by introducing greater transparency and competition to drive down costs and incentivise better service and clearer redress for consumers. 

Testing

There are three main components to Home Information Packs: searches and other legal documents; Energy Performance Certificates; and the home condition surveys that make up the other component of a full Home Condition Report.  It is essential that all aspects of Home Information Packs are properly tested before full implementation.  We need to be sure that consumers understand, value and can utilise the information that HIPs provide; that the assumed benefits will be realised; and that the different operating systems underpinning HIPs will work effectively.

As part of our ongoing programme of implementation, we have already successfully tested over 14,000 HIPs with searches, but largely without Home Condition Reports, in the dry run so far.  Over the course of the summer we propose to undertake further consumer research on Home Condition Reports; to study in greater detail the 250 HIPs that have been produced to date with some kind of survey; and to look to see what more we can learn from experience in other countries where HIPs have been introduced successfully or are currently being proposed.  From the autumn the emphasis of our implementation programme will switch to the testing of Energy Performance Certificates and Home Condition Reports.  Working with the industry and with consumers, we are proposing to support a series of area based trials and we will test proposals such as allowing sellers to start marketing their homes if they have already commissioned their HIP rather than having to wait up to 14 days. There will be independent assessment and monitoring of all aspects of the dry run.

Roll out

It is also important that reforms are introduced on a timetable and as part of a programme that maximises the benefits for consumers and the environment.

As part of the development of the dry run we have engaged in detailed consultation with a wide range of stakeholders and have gathered substantial information on the progress of implementation so far. As a result, we have concluded that there would be significant risks and potential disadvantages to consumers from a mandatory “big bang” introduction of full Home Condition Reports on 1 June 2007. In particular:   

·          Further testing is needed to ensure that Home Condition Reports deliver the assumed benefits for consumers and that the operating systems that support them work smoothly.  Design work on the dry run has made it clear that this cannot be completed in time for the results to be taken into account in by 1 June. 

·          A recent report from the Council of Mortgage Lenders identified the real possibility that some lenders might not be fully geared up to use HCRs until 2008-09.  In particular the industry’s plans for bringing in Automated Valuation Models means that many lenders will not have them in place by June 2007 and so will continue to seek separate mortgage valuation surveys where they could have relied on a Home Condition Report. 

·          There are concerns about the number of inspectors that will be in place in time for June next year. 

Moreover, because of our commitment to addressing climate change we do not want to jeopardise the successful introduction of Energy Performance Certificates at the earliest possible opportunity by pursuing the ‘big bang’ mandatory introduction of full Home Condition Reports at the same time. 

We believe that progressive market-led take-up of full HCRs could strongly benefit consumers.  Bearing in mind our commitment to the early introduction of Energy Performance Certificates, combining an Energy Performance Certificate and a full Home Condition Report at the same time is likely to offer significant additional benefits to buyers and sellers.  In particular, sellers offering full Home Condition Reports should be more likely to benefit from swifter sales and suffer fewer transaction failures, as accepted offers are much less likely to be re-opened as a result of new information coming to light. In addition, once Automated Valuation Models are in place, Home Condition Reports should mean buyers get cheaper and swifter valuations and mortgage offers. We therefore believe that there will be a significant incentive for consumers to top up their HIPs voluntarily to include full Home Condition Reports and that this is a product that the market can and should deliver. 

Therefore we have concluded that: 

·          HIPs will be introduced with searches and other key documents from 1 June 2007.

·          Energy Performance Certificates will be included in HIPs on a mandatory basis from 1 June 2007. 

·          We will work with the industry to facilitate market-led take-up of full HCRs. As part of this approach, we will explore with the sector a wide range of options to enable a successful and innovative market for HCRs, including options for supporting the provision of necessary systems, effective demonstration projects for HCRs, and will consider the case for pump-priming funding.    This market-led approach has the added benefit of giving industry more flexibility to innovate and adapt to consumer preferences.  

·          This means that the remaining aspects of Home Condition Reports will not be made mandatory from June next year, but HCRs will be authorised documents that sellers will be able to include in their packs 

·          Mandatory HCRs will remain on the table if the industry fails to make a success of the roll out of HCRs 

As part of the next phase of reform of we will also be setting out our plans for an ombudsman scheme for estate agents to strengthen consumer protection as well as further proposals to review competition and transparency in the industry to the benefit of consumers 

We believe that these arrangements will ensure that Home Information Packs are implemented in a way that maximises benefits for consumers and the environment and successfully enables the long term transformation of the home buying and selling market. 

 

 

14th July 2006

The Conservative Party has formally announced their intention to scrap Home Information Packs when elected. Their Shadow Housing Minister Michael Gove MP has recently given the government a number of 'grillings' in the Commons over their misguided policy on HIPs. A recent Early Day Motion will give you a flavour of what the Tories think. The support of 132 MPs across all three parties is impressive, particularly bearing in mind 'Front Bench ' Members cannot add their names to EDMs -  see this link

 

 

7th June 2006
Press Association release - SEE Trevor Kent's comment directly below

Controversy over Government's Home Information Pack plans

Home Information Pack plans have caused controversy

The Government has been challenged over its plans to introduce Home Information Packs across the country.

By June 1 next year all homeowners will need to arrange for a pack to be prepared, costing more than £700, before putting their homes up for sale.

But Michael Gove, for Tories, asked if ministers would declare it a success regardless of the outcome and told Housing and Planning Minister Yvette Cooper she was "all too well aware that every industry expert insists on the need for an appropriate dry run before we press ahead with this intervention in the marketplace".

"But so far only 200 of the 4,000 promised home inspectors have actually qualified. No specific geographical areas have yet been earmarked for dry runs, despite what your predecessor promised in 2004.

"We have no clear and unambiguous and independently audited criteria for judging the success of these dry runs.

"Can you actually tell us what the benchmark for success in the these dry runs will be or will ministers simply award themselves a pass mark irrespective of the results?"

But Ms Cooper, responding at Commons question time, said Mr Gove had been an advocate for those in the industry who opposed the packs because they made money out of the current system and warned him against becoming "the parliamentary spokesperson for the National Association of Estate Agents who may have their interests in this process".

"We have made clear for many months that we will introduce a dry run right across the country so that we can test the component parts of Home Information Packs and it is important that buyers and sellers should be able to see improvements and efficiency in the current system."

She urged the Tories to listen to the Consumers Association and "buyers and sellers right across the country" because they are "wasting loads of money in the current system and I don't think that's fair".

Copyright Press Association 2006

 

 


RESPONSE TO ABOVE PRESS RELEASE
FROM TREVOR KENT LEADING ANTI-HIP CAMPAIGNER & FORMER
PRESIDENT OF THE NAEA

 

"How dare Housing Minister Yvette Cooper stoop so low as to suggest her Tory Shadow counterpart Michael Gove MP is becoming the 'parliamentary spokesperson of the NAEA', " says Trevor Kent, the Association's former president. "as if the next government would make a major policy decision such as to scrap HIPs just on the say so of a single small professional body with a personal interest. ".

"Ms Cooper's problem is that she has inherited from five previous Housing Ministers a chalice brim full of bile and prejudice and she's not woman enough to grasp the nettle and tell her boss to drop the whole caboodle right now, before her brew poisons the whole of the property industry. Her's and her predecessors' only policy continues to be to belittle all constructive criticism ." he continued.

Kent claims that the government has known since 1998 that  their  proposed Home Information Packs have been ruled as unworkable and un-necessary  by every branch of the professional property industry.  The initial introductory Department under John Prescott  firstly sought votes by suggesting HIP introduction would 'end gazumping' , having been persuaded gazumping was a rare occurrence they then suggested HIPs would be the saviour of the first time buyer - (apparently rampant property price inflation had nothing to do with first timers' inability to buy, no it was the fact that sellers didn't tell buyers what might be wrong with their houses, that was the problem)!

Thus her gadereen rush to introduce HIPs and the turning of  a deaf ear to warnings from The Law Society, the RICS, the CML, the BSA, indeed just about everyone who knows what they're talking about, not just the NAEA.  The only support the government could find was from Which? the magazine publishers. To compliment their smoke and mirrors deception  that HIPs will be good for us,  the government even encouraged the creation of a 'new industry' -  Home Information Pack Providers and gave their newly formed Association a leg up -  to the extent of seeing one of their own staff (already provided to the ODPM 'on secondment' by HBOS) joining as Deputy  Director General. 

" I suggest Ms Cooper looks to her own house before changing the way others sell theirs," concludes Trevor Kent, "HIP introduction on June 1st 2007 will lead to  property market melt-down  of undreamed of proportions and  produce 3m very disgruntled voters in each and every  year 'till the Tories do the sensible thing".

Ends

Trevor Kent

Former President of The National Association of Estate Agents

Anti-HIP Campaigner and Property Broadcaster
trevorkent@homeinformationpacks.com  
or 01753 885522

 

 

 

TREVOR KENT'S PRESS RELEASE  - 10th April 2006

YVETTE COOPER'S 'DRY-RUN' OF HIPS - 'A WHITEWASH'

Trevor Kent, former president of The National Association of Estate Agents, and a fervent Anti-Home Information Pack campaigner, has poured scorn on the announcement from Yvette Cooper MP at the  ODPM that they are to institute a dry run to evaluate  the Packs' efficacy. The Housing Minister recently said that the dry run will  "make sure that all aspects of the Packs are properly tested before being fully introduced next year".

"What arrant nonsense this is" says Trevor Kent, " the ODPM's so called dry run is being conducted for them  exclusively by companies already totally committed mentally and financially to the introduction of the new scheme.  With multi-million pound investments already made by these participants with  the prospect of securing a share of the estimated 1.75m HIPs a year (at an average cost per report of £1000),  who's going to say to the ODPM  ' well actually our dry run findings reveal HIPs aren't needed and won't work' ?". 

Introduction of HIPs has been a Labour Manifesto pledge since 1997, but opposition has snowballed as professionals have realised the government is, at last, taking serious steps towards implementation despite  their dire warnings.  Trevor Kent suggests there is no public  support for the introduction of a legally enforceable two week delay before being 'allowed' to put one's home up for sale. He  also feels that owners will not be prepared to pay £1000 + for their HIP to be prepared by faceless Home Inspector/Conveyancer conglomerates and then see intimate details of their home and wealth posted on the internet and recorded in government departments for who knows what future snooping.   

"If Ms Cooper wants a serious and objective  report on whether Home Information Packs stand a cat in hell's chance of working and being accepted by the public, then she should include some of the 1000 branches of independent estate agents who wrote to her recently to tell her 'they won't' .  Or she could include some members of the Law Society's property division who recently said 'HIPs should come with a health warning'.  Even the Council of Mortgage Lenders have ' grave doubts'  now, and the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors  are less supportive than they were," Kent adds.

The Conservative Party have pledged to repeal Home Information Packs if they are returned to power at the next election , and Ian Liddell-Grainger MP is to introduce a 10 Minute Rule Bill immediately the House returns after the Easter recess, calling for their immediate abolition. In the meantime Trevor Kent  continues to chant the mantra that 'Sellers Packs Legislation Is Not The Answer' -  and if there is to be a dry run to find out that he's right, then it should be fairly and objectively conducted.

 Trevor Kent
Former President of The National Association of Estate Agents

Anti-HIP Campaigner and Property Broadcaster

trevorkent@homeinformationpacks.com  
or 01753 885522

 

 

10 April 2006

HIPs to hit where it hurts
Tentative first time sellers will suffer most with the introduction of HIPs, says
NAEA

Struggling first time sellers are likely to be hit the hardest by Government plans to introduce Home Information Packs (HIPs) to the housing market in June 2007, according to research by the National Association of Estate Agents ( NAEA ).  

Of those currently in the first time seller bracket (24 to 34 year olds), 76 per cent said withdrawal costs incurred via the HIP would discourage them from putting their homes on the market.  A massive 80 per cent of respondents in the survey’s 16-24 age bracket also stated that such costs would, in theory, deter them from putting a home on the market.   

Currently any home put on the market with an estate agent can be withdrawn from sale – if it does not find a buyer, or the owners need to stay put for whatever reason – without incurring any costs.  From June 2007, when HIPs are introduced, homeowners will have to pay the fee for their HIP when they remove their home from the market, regardless of whether the property has sold or not.   

Chief executive of the NAEA Peter Bolton King says; “Those on the lower rungs of the housing ladder clearly need all the help they can get in order to find their feet financially.  This is the age at which children come along, and families are most likely to be looking for more space.   

“With the anticipated cost of the HIP set at between £600 and £1,000, plus VAT, and high levels of stamp duty to contend with, many first time sellers may find that the next step up the ladder is simply too much of a stretch for them, and be forced to stay put.  This will, of course, impact on the rest of the housing market, slowing it right down and causing frustration for first time buyers and those further up the housing ladder alike.”

- Ends -

Notes to editors  
The
NAEA survey also found that a significant number of experienced sellers were deterred from putting their homes on the market by the potential withdrawal costs of HIPs, with almost 68 per cent of those aged 55+, 69 per cent of 35 – 44 year olds and 71 per cent of 45 – 54 year olds in agreement.   

The Halifax First Time Buyer Annual Review published in January 2006 confirmed the average age of the first time buyer is now 33 years old.  

About the research  
This research for the NAEA was carried out online by Tickbox.net between
24 February 2006 and 28 February 2006 , amongst a nationally representative sample of 1295 UK adults aged 16 plus.  

Tickbox.net is a leading market research organisation, carrying out consumer, corporate and niche market surveys online amongst a 50,000 plus member panel.  

Tickbox.net is a member of the BMRA (British Market Research Association), follows the codes of the MRS (Market Research Society) and is fully registered and compliant with the Data Protection Register, as well as being the preferred research supplier of the PRCA (Public Relations Consultants Association).  

 About the NAEA  
The National Association of Estate Agents (
NAEA ) is the UK ’s leading professional body for estate agency personnel, representing the interests of approximately 10,000 members who practice across all aspects of property services both in the UK and overseas. These include residential and commercial sales and lettings, property management, business transfer and auctioneering.  

The National Association of Estate Agents is dedicated to the goal of professionalism within high street estate agency. Its aim is to reassure the general public that by appointing an NAEA member to represent them they will receive in return the highest level of integrity and service in both sales and lettings. Each NAEA member is bound by a vigorously enforced Code of Practice and adheres to professional Rules of Conduct. Failure to do so can result in heavy financial penalties and possible expulsion from the Association.

 

 

TREVOR KENT'S PRESS RELEASE  - 20th February 2006

A nervous and almost shifty-looking Housing Minister, Yvette Cooper, failed to impress on 'Tonight with Trevor McDonald' on 20th February, when asked to justify the billion pound introduction of Home Information Packs due next year. "Critics queued up to pick holes in her system that will force home sellers to write a cheque for £1000 or more, and wait two to three weeks before being allowed to put their homes on the market" reports Trevor Kent, former President of The National Association of Estate Agents and one of the country's most vociferous critics of the scheme.  

 Kent continued " The programme confirmed that I am not a cranky lone voice in the wilderness as the ODPM has suggested, by highlighting heavyweight criticism from important bodies in the home-sale industry such as the Council of Mortgage Lenders, the Law Society and the NAEA".

 Cooper and by implication, her boss John Prescott, seemed to be able to find only one reason why three million people a year should have to lash out good money for a HIP - "First time buyers should be aware of the risks and  protected from abortive costs if a property turns out to be in poor condition". Yet everyone knows, except her it seems, that first time buyers are a fast disappearing breed due to house price inflation, and all experts accept that HIPs will exacerbate inflation dramatically, making it harder still for them to buy.

 " A Home Information Pack will be between 100 and 200 pages long and will contain some very personal details of intending sellers' homes, wealth and life-styles. It will be available not just for prospective purchasers of the home for sale to inspect, but also goodness knows what governmental departments and  quasi-official snoopers to delve in to, as each report will be centrally recorded" concludes Trevor Kent, " this crazy, expensive, unnecessary rubbish must be stopped, and soon".

  

Trevor Kent
Former President of The National Association of Estate Agents
Anti-HIP Campaigner and Property Broadcaster
trevorkent@homeinformationpacks.com  
or 01753 885522

 

 

 

 


Tuesday 31 January 2006

Home Information Packs should carry Health Warning

The Law Society has warned that a crucial “health warning” must be carried on all Home Information Packs (HIPs).

In its response the draft HIP regulations, the Law Society has suggested that the warning should reinforce to the buyer the risk of taking on substantial liabilities and commitments without the benefit of independent advice.

Kevin Martin, Law Society President, is concerned that without the warning there will be serious risks to the consumer:  “HIPs contain important legal documents on which professional advice must be obtained. Without appropriate warnings there is a real risk that a buyer could be pressurised into buying a property without independent advice.  Buying a home is often the biggest single purchase most people make.”

Commenting on the need for the packs to be dated and authenticated, Kevin Martin, said: “Currently there is no provision within the regulations for information within the HIP or the HIP itself to be authenticated or confirmed by the seller. This is a serious defect.”

Mr Martin said: “It is essential that HIPs will, in fact, bring the benefits to consumers that the Government claims.  Packs should be seen as part of the conveyancing process and not just a component of the marketing process. They should contain the best possible information to assist buyers and their solicitors to move transactions forward as quickly as possible.

Ends

28 February 2006  

 RESALE MARKET OF NEARLY NEW PROPERTIES COULD SUFFER WITH ADVENT OF HIPS

The NAEA predicts lengthy delays during resale of new build property  

The National Association of Estate Agents (NAEA) is cautioning the Government that the introduction of Home Information Packs (HIPs), designed to speed up house buying, could in fact cause frustrating delays for many people trying to sell a property which still has time to run on its new home warranty.

According to the Council of Mortgage Lenders*, most new properties are covered by a guarantee scheme to protect buyers against any major structural faults which may develop in the first 10 years after the property is built.  The anticipated delays will probably arise from the Home Condition Report (HCR) element of the HIP, due to be mandatory from June 2007, and its application with regard to new build properties with an exisitng warranty. 

The HCR requires a survey by home inspectors on all property for sale to bring to light any flaws before it goes onto the market, which could affect a property’s saleability.

Stewart Lilly, chairman of the NAEA Land and New Homes Groups explains: “If the HCR highlights any wear and tear on the property at this stage, the seller will naturally be inclined to get these fixed before it goes on the market, in order to achieve the best price.   A claim on the 10 year warranty can take up to nine months to deal with, depending upon the severity of the problem.  During this period the homeowner may not be able to market the property as for sale, causing extreme frustration. It may also ha